Cases 1 - 10 of 40
BUDGE v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2024cv00996
Plaintiff:
BRANDON L BUDGE and BRANDON L. BUDGE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
IN RE: WRIT OF ATTACHMENT ISSUED TO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
as 1:2022mc00090
In Re:
WRIT OF ATTACHMENT ISSUED TO U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Plaintiff:
ANITA BRALOCK and BRANDON FRYMAN
Defendant:
AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES, INC.
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
MAVERICK GAMING LLC v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
MAVERICK GAMING LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
WORLEY et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2021cv01312
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, MARTHA MEDINA-MALTES and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH AMELIA WORLEY, CONNOR JAMES WORLEY, LOGAN ROBERT WORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101
SCHNEIDER v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2018cv02294
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Plaintiff:
BRANDON C. SCHNEIDER
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
