Cases 1 - 9 of 9
William Rouser v. Theo White, et al
as 20-56349
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN HAWS, MATTHEW CATE, B. FLORES, Correctional Counselor I and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM ROUSER
Defendant:
JAMES E. TILTON, JACK R. REAGAN, Chief Inmate Appeal and E. W. MEADS, Protestant Chaplain
Allen et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Clifton Allen , Stephanie Allen , Krissa Anderson and others
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Allen et al v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Clifton Allen , Stephanie Allen , Krissa Anderson and others
Defendant:
24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Sport and Fitness Clubs of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Richard Jason Shepherd v. Michael Martel, Warden
as 2:2008cv02669
Respondent:
Brian Haws and Michael Martel
Petitioner:
Richard Jason Shepherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rouser v. White, et al
as 2:1993cv00767
Plaintiff:
William Rouser
Defendant:
Theo White , James Gomez , J. Yates and others
Amicu:
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry Lionel White v. California State Prison L.A. County et al
as 2:2009cv06810
Plaintiff:
Larry Lionel White
Defendant:
California State Prison L.A. County, Brian Haws, Brian Haws and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Silean Miller v. Brian Haws et al
as 5:2009cv01491
Petitioner:
Anthony Silean Miller
Respondent:
The Attorney General of California and Brian Haws
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lawrence Birks v. Brian Haw
as 09-71675
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE BIRKS
Respondent:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and BRIAN HAWS
Gregory Brownlow v. Haw
as 09-71217
Petitioner:
GREGORY BROWNLOW
Respondent:
BRIAN HAWS, Warden and HASS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
