Cases 1 - 10 of 163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
First National Bank and Trust Company of Okmulgee v. Young
as 6:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
First National Bank and Trust Company of Okmulgee
Defendant:
Patricia Boyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Prosperity Bank v. Coltrane Properties LTD et al
as 5:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Prosperity Bank
Defendant:
Coltrane Properties LTD, Miles L Mitzner, Carey E Jones and others
Garnishee:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Strother v. MidFirst Bank
as 5:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Andrew Strother
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Dudurkaewa et al v. MidFirst Bank
as 5:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Petimat Dudurkaewa
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Horton v. Tayloe et al
as 5:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
John D Horton
Defendant:
Donald Emmitt Tayloe, Michael Charles Flanagan, Gerald Frank Neuwirth and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cherry v. Capital One Bank USA NA
as 5:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cherry
Defendant:
Capital One Bank USA NA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Cherry v. Comenity Capital Bank
as 5:2023cv00770
Plaintiff:
Laurie Cherry
Defendant:
Comenity Capital Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Champion v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00757
Plaintiff:
Lord Caitanya A Champion
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Oklahoma Department of Human Services, Renee Banks and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
