Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00018
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC v. Gupta
as 1:2020cv03386
Defendant:
Rajesh Gupta
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07338
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07339
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00901
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Lott-Muhammad et al v. Selene Finance, LP
as 1:2015cv09016
Plaintiff:
Dora Lott-Muhammad and Barney Muhammad
Defendant:
Selene Finance, LP and Selene Ventures GP LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC et al v. Salamah
as 3:2014cv50099
Plaintiff:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney FA Notes Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Naseem Mohammed Salamah
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
EGI-TRB LLC et al v. ABN AMRO Clearing Chicago LLC et al
as 1:2012cv01315
Plaintiff:
EGI-TRB LLC , Tower CH, LLC , Tower DC, LLC and others
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Clearing Chicago LLC, Alberta W. Chandler Marital Trust No. 2, Alpine Associated LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Scanlan et al v. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv08294
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Scanlan and Kevin J. Steffen
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC and Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Sec, et al v. Kimmes, et al
as 1:1989cv05942
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exch
Defendant:
Arnold Kimmes , Thomas Quinn , Michael Wright and others
Receiver:
Steven S Scholes
Intervenor_defendant:
Frank Quinn
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
