Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 3:2022cv01419
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, State of Louisiana, City of Baton Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doe v. Louisiana Department of Justice et al
as 6:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Justice, Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt State of Louisiana, City of Baton Organizations Act and Rouge and Parish of East Baton Rouge and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bistrika et al v. Hunter et al
as 6:2010cv01545
Counter Claimant:
Deputy Tim Beaver, Deputy Nicholas Hunter, Deputy Cody Lane and others
503) 373-4367 (fax:
Kirstin E. Lurtz, Kirstin E. Lurtz, Kirstin E. Lurtz and others
Defendant:
Deputy Tim Beaver, City of Salem, Deputy Nicholas Hunter and others
Counter Defendant:
Alexander Bistrika, Jr., Alexander Bistrika, Sr., Lidia Bistrika and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bistrika, Jr., Alexander Bistrika, Sr., Lidia Bistrika and others
Unknown:
Sara K. Staggs, Sara K. Staggs, Sara K. Staggs and others
503)373-4367 (fax:
Gloria M. Roy, Gloria M. Roy, Gloria M. Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2007cv00645
Plaintiff:
Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company, Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company and Beaver Creek Cooperative Telephone Company
Defendant:
Clackamas County, Martha Schrader, Bill Kennemer and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
