Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Favor v. Minaj, et al.
as 24-3115
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: NIKKI MINAJ, MAXINE A. and BABY CASH MONEY RECORDS
Favor v. Harper
as 24-3116
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: RAQUEL HARPER
Favor v. Harper
as 24-1694
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: ANTHONY HARPER
Brandon Favor v. Michael Pastor
as 23-70057
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: MICHAEL EDWARD PASTOR
Brandon Favor v. Marcus Musante
as 23-70051
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: MARCUS MUSANTE, California Prosecutor
Brandon Favor v. CDCR, et al
as 19-55637
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR, AKA Brandon A. Favor, AKA Brandon Alexander Favor L., AKA Brandon Favor-El
Brandon Favor v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 19-55610
Respondent / Appellee: CAMILLE TOWNSEND, GALVIN LAW GROUP, JASMINE SCOTT and others
Petitioner / Appellant: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR, AKA Brandon A. Favor, AKA Brandon Alexander Favor L., AKA Brandon Favor-El
Brandon Alexander Favor v. United States Supreme Court et al
as 2:2018cv03166
Defendant: Salaam Abdul, Los Angeles County Superior Court, United States Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff: Brandon Alexander Favor
Brandon Alexander Favor v. City of Los Angeles Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02363
Defendant: Detective Salaam Abdol, Officer Dave Numm, Elizabeth Rico and others
Plaintiff: Brandon Alexander Favor
Brandon Alexander Favor v. Nancy Svetich Pogue et al
as 2:2018cv01800
Defendant: County of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles Sheriff's Department, County of Los Angeles Superior Court and others
Plaintiff: Brandon Alexander Favor

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?