Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Chase Peden, et al v. Glenn Stephens, et al
as 21-10723
Defendant / Appellee:
GLENN STEPHENS, DANNY PORTER, CAROLE STEPHENS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARJORIE PEDEN, CHASE PADEN and CHASE PEDEN
David Johnston v. R.L. Conway
as 19-11473
Defendant / Appellee:
R.L. (BUTCH) CONWAY and MARIE SATURNE, DDS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JOSEPH JOHNSTON
GREENE v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 1:2016cv02115
Plaintiff:
LAUREN GREENE
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, AMY DOSIK, PETER DOSIK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Vance Johnson v. R.L. Conway, et al
as 16-12129
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VANCE R. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
R.L. (BUTCH) CONWAY, CHRISTOPHER REVELS, SO#692, ROBERT BAILEY, SO#893 and others
Shawn Shavers
as 14-14752
Petitioner:
SHAWN ANTONIO SHAVERS
Mandamus Respondent:
R.L. (BUTCH) CONWAY, ADRIAN SMITH WATKINS, Gwinnett County Jail, et. seq., GEORGE F. HUTCHINSON, III, Sheriff and others
Kumar Chinnathambi, et al v. Paul Cwalina, et al
as 13-14505
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KUMAR CHINNATHAMBI, SHESHAMANI VISWANAHAN, PARVATHI SIVANADYAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PAUL CWALINA, GWINETT COUNTY, GEORGIA, VALMIKINATHAN P. RAGHUNATHAN and others
Plaintiff:
ANNAMALAI ANNAMALAI
Defendant:
TERESA LOUIS, SEEMA PATEL, SELVI VASUDEVAN, Dr. and others
Johnson v. Conway et al
as 1:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
Vance R. Johnson
Defendant:
R.L. Butch Conway , Christopher Revels, Robert Bailey and others
Sanchez v. Hogan et al
as 1:2010cv00267
Plaintiff:
Eustaquio P Sanchez
Defendant:
J J Hogan, Mike Boyd, Gary Lancaster and others
Monger v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2010cv00141
Plaintiff:
Marcus Monger
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Sonny Perdue, R.L. (Butch) Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Type:
Other Statutes
Graber v. M&T Bank Corp. et al
as 1:2009mi00556
Plaintiff:
Howard Alan Graber
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corp., Mark J. Czarnecki, Shaun Donovan and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
