Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Anderson, Gordon et al v. Newland, Bryan et al
as 3:2023cv00777
Plaintiff:
Gordon Anderson, Mary Anderson, Big Crooked Lake TOP, LLC and others
Defendant:
Bryan Newland, Tammie Poitra, Deb Haaland and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Lindenberger, Deborah v. Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP et al
as 3:2022cv00427
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lindenberger
Defendant:
Cane Bay Partners VI, LLLP, Kirk Chewning, David Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00297
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Sperberg v. Preferred Credit Inc et al
as 1:2018cv01789
Defendant:
James Bartzen, Preferred Credit Inc and Boardman and Clark LLP
Plaintiff:
Becky Sperberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark Technology LLC et al v. Corncob Inc et al
as 2:2018cv01559
Plaintiff:
Clark Engineering Corporation and Clark Technology LLC
Defendant:
Corncob Inc and Pro-Equipment Inc
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 251
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Superior Performers, Inc. v. Alecos et al
as 1:2015mc00049
Respondent:
Stephanie Alecos and Gregg Clark
Petitioner:
Superior Performers, Inc.
Defendant:
Shawn Meaike , Marc Meade , Bryant Stone and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
