Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Robert Gibbs v. B. Boyd, et al
as 19-15647
Defendant:
SHASTA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, JACKSON, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT A. GIBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. LITTLE, Officer and B. BOYD, Officer
Chinatown Neighborhood Associa, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 14-15781
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit corporation and ASIAN AMERICANS FOR POLITICAL ADVANCEMENT, a political action committee
Defendant - Appellee:
KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the State of California and CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director, California Department of Fish and Game
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION and ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN OCEAN HARMONY ALLIANCE
Chinatown Neighborhood Associa, et al v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 13-15188
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHINATOWN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, a nonprofit corporation and ASIAN AMERICANS FOR POLITICAL ADVANCEMENT, a political action committee
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, Attorney General of the State of California and CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director, California Department of Fish and Game
Intervenor-Defendant - Appellee:
THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, MONETERY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION and ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN OCEAN HARMONY ALLIANCE
Pace et al v. Bonham et al
as 1:2012cv05610
Plaintiff:
Felice Pace and Wilderness Watch
Defendant:
Charlton H. Bonham, Stafford Lehr and California Department of Fish and Game
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
California Department of Fish and Game v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2012cv01396
Plaintiff:
California Department of Fish and Game
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers and Meredith W.B. Temple
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
California Department of Fish and Game v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 2:2012at00745
Plaintiff:
California Department of Fish and Game
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers and Meredith W.B. Temple
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Don Yaran, et al v. City of Calimesa, et al
as 12-55391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON YARAN and ROBERT EUGENE SCHAEFER
Defendant:
CITY OF CALIMESA, a political subdivision and Body Politic of the State of California, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, a political subdivision and Body Politic or corporate division of the State of California, JOHN MOLLOY, a human impersonating a governmentally privileged Person, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as an alleged Judge of the Superior Court and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARDS WATSON & GERSHON, A Professional Corporation, KEVIN G. ENNIS, a human impersonating a governmentally privileged Person, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as City Attorney, STEVEN R. ORR, a human impersonating a governmentally privileged Person, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as City Attorney and others
California Department of Toxic Substances Control et al v. A and G German Cars et al
as 2:2011cv07051
Defendant:
A O Smith Corp, A and G German Cars, A and H Plating Inc and others
Plaintiff:
California Department of Fish and Game, California Department of Toxic Substances Control and California Regional Water Quality Control Board
Tank/Cleaning:
Chemical Transportation
Gammaloy Ltd:
Facet Energy
Reynolds v. State of California Department of Fish and Game
as 2:2011cv01381
Plaintiff:
John Reynolds
Defendant:
State of California and California Department of Fish and Game
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Don Yarian et al v. City of Calimesa et al
as 2:2011cv03610
Defendant:
Beaumont Police Department Animal Care Division, Tori Brakefield, Tori Brakefield and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Schaefer and Don Yarian
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
