Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Reybol v. California Department of Developmental Services et al
as 3:2024cv02871
Plaintiff:
Arcelio Joseph Reybol
Defendant:
California Department of Developmental Services, California Department of Social Services, California Department of Public Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2751
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor, ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General and others
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2755
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, ROBERT BONTA and others
Other:
COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK, LAMBERT BASSLER, JUDITH COBURN and others
Andrew Maria v. California Department of Health Care Services
as 2:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
Andrew Maria
Defendant:
California Department of Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Aids Healthcare Foundation v. California Department of Health Care Services, et al
as 22-56203
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION, DBA PHC California
Defendant / Appellant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES and MICHELLE BAASS, in her official capacity as Director of the California Department of Health Care Services
AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. California Department of Health Care Services et al
as 2:2022cv06636
Plaintiff:
AIDS Healthcare Foundation d/b/a PHC California and AIDS Healthcare Foundation doing business as PHC California
Defendant:
California Department of Health Care Services and Michelle Baass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Dignity Health, et al v. Will Lightbourne, et al
as 21-16295
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DIGNITY HEALTH, a California non-profit corporation and DIGNITY COMMUNITY CARE, a Colorado non-profit corporation
Plaintiff:
SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILL LIGHTBOURNE, in his official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, RAUL RAMIREZ, in his official capacity as Chief of the DHCS Office of Health Information Technology, BRUCE LIM, in his official capacity as DHCS Deputy Director of Audits and Investigations Branch; and others
San Joaquin Community Hospital, et al v. Will Lightbourne, et al
as 21-16294
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a California nonprofit reiigious corporation, DBA Adventist Health Bakersfield, HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, a Califonria nonprofit religious corporation and as successor in interest to Central Valley General Hospital, fka Central Valley General Hospital, DBA Adventist Health Hanford, FEATHER RIVER HOSPITAL, a Califonria nonprofit religious corporation, DBA Adventist Health Feather River and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WILL LIGHTBOURNE, in his official capacity as the Director of the California Department of Health Care Services, RAUL RAMIREZ, in his official capacity as Chief of the DHCS Office of Health Information Technology, BRUCE LIM, in his official capacity as DHCS Deputy Director of Audits and Investigations Branch; and others
Defendant:
RICHARD FIGUEROA
St. Vincent Medical Center et al v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2020cv01771
Defendant:
Raul Ramirez, Bruce Lim, California Department of Health Care Services and others
Plaintiff:
O'Connor Hospital, St. Vincent Medical Center and Seton Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fairchild Medical Center v. Figueroa et al
as 2:2020cv00487
Defendant:
Richard Figueroa, County of Siskiyou, Sarah Collard and others
Plaintiff:
Fairchild Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
