Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Calzadilla v. Banks
as 21-60333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yuri Calzadilla
Defendant / Appellee:
Tirah Wesley Mixon, Lieutenant in disciplinary department at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, Raniece Matthews, employee in Administrative Remedy Program at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, Jessica Hill, employee at central kitchen at Central Mississippi Correctional Facility and others
Kendall Magee v. Gloria Perry, et al
as 20-60349
Defendant / Appellee:
NURSE NINA WALTZER, CMCF, Individually and in her Official Capacity, NURSE LISSA COLLINS, Medical Administrator/Practitioner, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility, CMCF, Individually and in her Official Capacity, GLORIA PERRY, Chief Medical Compliance Officer, Mississippi Department of Corrections (MDOC), Individually and in her Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENDALL K. MAGEE
Sylvester Branch v. MS Department of Corrections
as 19-60802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SYLVESTER LEE BRANCH
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN LADNER, Warden, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility Area II
Patricia Brown v. Cmsnr of the MS Dept of Corr, et al
as 19-60705
Petitioner / Appellant:
PATRICIA ANN BROWN
Respondent / Appellee:
X, Y, AND Z, COMMISSIONER OF THE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and SHELIA PARKS, Warden of Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Henry Gibbs, Jr. v. Brian Ladner
as 19-60198
Petitioner / Appellant:
HENRY GIBBS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN LADNER, Warden, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Thomas Jones v. Ronald King, Superintendent
as 19-60173
Petitioner / Appellant:
THOMAS H. JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
RONALD KING, Superintendent, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Kep Lafoon v. Ron King
as 19-60029
Respondent / Appellee:
RON KING, Superintendent, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEP LAFOON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
