Cases 1 - 10 of 20
PHI Health, LLC v. Boon-Chapman Benefit Administrators, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00836
Petitioner:
PHI Health, LLC
Respondent:
Boon-Chapman Benefit Administrators, Inc., Citizens Medical Center and XYZ CORP
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Schneider v. Natera, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
John Harvey Schneider
Defendant:
Natera, Inc., Steve Chapman, Michael Brophy and others
Bentler v. Exxon Mobile Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00335
Defendant:
Neil A Chapman, Exxon Mobile Corporation, Jeffrey J Woodbury and others
Plaintiff:
Martin J Bentler, Amalgamated Bank and State of Rhode Island
Petitioner:
Steven J. Rando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Presentation Technologies, LLC v. Chapman
as 3:2020cv03463
Plaintiff:
Presentation Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Craig Chapman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Pope v. Galveston County et al
as 3:2018mc00004
Plaintiff:
Denise Pope
Defendant:
Galveston County, Boone Chapman, Soluta Health and others
Voigt et al v. CSX Transportation Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01018
Defendant:
CSX Transportation Inc , ECHO Tours and Charters LP , Louis Ambrose, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Dee Voigt
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Melissa Messerly , Kimberly Kay Chapman , Aubrey O Landrum and others
Intervenor_defendant:
ABC Companies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Chapman v. Persolve, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv01139
Plaintiff:
Terrence Chapman
Defendant:
Crown Asset Management, LLC and Persolve, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In Re: Jury Service October 11, 2016
as 3:2016mc00104
Defendant:
Margaret Grace Chapman
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
