Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Lowe v. Chicago Police Department Precint 5
as 1:2024cv06296
Plaintiff:
Latasha L Lowe
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department Precint 5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Lowe v. Chicago Police Department
as 1:2024cv05879
Defendant:
Chicago Police Department
Plaintiff:
Latasha L Lowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Evangelista v. Alexa et al
as 1:2023cv03600
Plaintiff:
Jesse Twano Evangelista
Defendant:
Michelene A. Alexa and Chicago Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Terrance McCauley-Bey v. Chicago Police Department, et al
as 21-2149
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, ILLINOIS TOLLWAY, COOK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TERRANCE A. MCCAULEY-BEY
Anton Aseves v. State of Illinois, et al
as 20-2273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTON ASEVES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOES, Detectives #1 and #2, STATE OF ILLINOIS, CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 9th District Municipal Capacity and others
Anthony Grayer v. Officer Pacheco, et al
as 20-1955
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER PACHECO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY GRAYER
Anthony Grayer v. Officer Pacheco, et al
as 20-1815
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT and OFFICER PACHECO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY GRAYER
Rigoberto Moreno v. Cook County, Illinois, et al
as 20-1682
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RIGOBERTO JOSE MORENO
Defendant / Appellee:
616 ARLINGTON PROPERTY LLC, BRIDGEVIEW BANK GROUP, DRW REAL ESTATE MANAGEMENT I LLC and others
Jamell Malone v. Social 25, et al
as 20-1547
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN AGENTS and SOCIAL 25
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMELL O. MALONE
Helene Re-Re Williams v. Chicago Police Department
as 20-1130
Defendant / Appellee:
CHICAGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, 19th District
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
