Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2755
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, ROBERT BONTA and others
Other:
COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK, LAMBERT BASSLER, JUDITH COBURN and others
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2751
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor, ROBERT BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General and others
Communities Actively Living Independent and Free et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2009cv00287
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and County of Los Angeles
Plaintiff:
Communities Actively Living Independent and Free and Audrey Harthorn
Unknown:
Debra J Patkin, Shawna L Parks, Maria Michelle Uzeta and others
Objector:
Steven J Stanwyck
Claimant:
The United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Mark Willits, et al v. City of Los Angele
as 13-80116
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MARK WILLITS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JUDY GRIFFIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BRENT PILGREEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity
Mark Willits, et al v. City of Los Angele
as 11-80012
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MARK WILLITS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JUDY GRIFFIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BRENT PILGREEN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
