Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Poe et al v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Peter Poe, Paula Poe, Patrick Poe and others
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond, Steven Katsis, Trevor Nutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaughn v. Arkansas Egg Company, Inc. et al
as 6:2017cv00086
Plaintiff:
Dakota Vaughn
Defendant:
Arkansas Egg Company, Inc. , Vital Farms, Inc. , Michael A. Cox, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bagwell v. Cox Commnications, Inc
as 5:2016cv01295
Defendant:
Cox Communications Inc
Plaintiff:
April Bagwell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Feeney et al v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 5:2016cv00440
Plaintiff:
Sean P Feeney and Louis W Grande
Defendant:
Cox Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hilbert et al v. City of Bristow et al
as 4:2014cv00263
Plaintiff:
Kerry Hilbert , Sherry Hilbert , Wayne M Cox and others
Defendant:
City of Bristow , Harlan Yocham and Tammy Sue Yocham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Feldman v. Cox Communications Incorporated
as 5:2013cv00055
Plaintiff:
Stanley Feldman
Defendant:
Cox Communications Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
v. MDL 2048 Cox Enterprises Inc Set-Top Cable Television Box Antitrust Litigation
as 5:2012ml02048
Plaintiff:
Richard Healy , Beverly Uhl , Todd Keitlen and others
Defendant:
Cox Communications Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Alwert v. Cox Communications, Inc.
as 5:2012cv01271
Defendant:
Cox Communications Inc
Plaintiff:
Andrew Alwert
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Lepre v. Cox Communications, Inc. et al
as 5:2012cv01187
Plaintiff:
George Lepre
Defendant:
Cox Communications Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
