Cases 1 - 10 of 10
David DeRosa v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01122
Plaintiff:
David DeRosa
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Robert Gaither v. Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01074
Plaintiff:
Robert Gaither
Defendant:
Aerojet Rocketdyne Holdings, Inc., Gail Baker, Marion C. Blakey and others
Warren G. Lichtenstein et al v. Eileen P. Drake et al
as 2:2022cv02788
Plaintiff:
Warren G. Lichtenstein and SPH Group Holdings
Defendant:
Eileen P. Drake, Kevin P. Chilton, Thomas A. Corcoran and others
Dubsky v. James
as 2:2017cv02116
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Dubsky
Defendant:
Deborah Lee James
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 2305
Edward A. Colley et al v. Deborah Lee James et al
as 2:2017cv03125
Plaintiff:
Edward A Colley and Frederick D Malcomb, Jr
Defendant:
PAUL H. GUEMMER, PATRICIA D. HOFFMAN, Deborah Lee James and others
Unknown:
Marian L Borum, Jeremy S Simon, Marian L Borum and others
Wong v. McHugh et.al.
as 3:2015cv01127
Plaintiff:
Connie Wong
Defendant:
John M. McHugh, Deborah Lee James, California Military Department and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Ringchop v. Guerrini Law Firm et al
as 4:2010mc80114
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ringchop
Defendant:
Guerrini Law Firm, John Donald Guerrini and Matthew Jackson Taylor
Ringchop v. American Express Bank, FSB et al
as 4:2010mc80113
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ringchop
Defendant:
American Express Bank, FSB, Kenneth I. Chenault, Daniel T. Henry and others
Ringchop v. Jaffe and Asher, LLP et al
as 4:2010mc80115
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ringchop
Defendant:
Jaffe and Asher, LLP, Sanford Stuart Asher, Gregory Eugene Galterio and others
Ringchop v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Contra Costa - Central District
as 4:2010mc80116
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lee Ringchop
Defendant:
Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Contra Costa - Central District
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
