Cases 1 - 10 of 11
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. SEUNG MOCK LEE, D.C. et al
as 2:2019cv21108
Defendant:
JAEDOO LEE, D.C., HYEO YEOUNG PARK, P.T., JIN HYUN PARK, L.Ac. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. RINKU et al
as 2:2019cv19593
Defendant:
Desai R Arunaben, Discount Wine and Spirits LLC, Amin S Rinku and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. THONDAVADI et al
as 3:2017cv04908
Plaintiff:
DEAN BROWN
Defendant:
NANDU THONDAVADI, DHRU DESAI, THOMAS E. SAWYER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
FIDELITY DEPOSIT & DISCOUNT BANK v. SHAH et al
as 2:2016mc00245
Plaintiff:
FIDELITY DEPOSIT & DISCOUNT BANK
Defendant:
LEENA SHAH, ANKIM SHAH, BHARAT PARIKH and others
FIDELITY DEPOSIT & DISCOUNT BANK v. SHAH et al
as 2:2016mc00246
Plaintiff:
FIDELITY DEPOSIT & DISCOUNT BANK
Defendant:
LEENA SHAH, ANKIM SHAH, BHARAT PARIKH and others
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. DESAI et al
as 2:2011cv05597
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
SHREYANS DESAI and SHREYSIDDH CAPITAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
BRUNETTI et al v. OLD BRIDGE MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2010cv05018
Plaintiff:
JOHN J. BRUNETTI , WHARTON IMPROVEMENT CORP , THE OAKS AT GLENWOOD, LLC and others
Defendant:
OLD BRIDGE MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY, TOWNSHIP OF OLD BRIDGE, NICHOLAS SMOLNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
DESAI et al v. CHERTOFF et al
as 2:2008cv01470
Plaintiff:
GOPESH DESAI and PREETI DESAI
Defendant:
MICHAEL CHERTOFF, EMILIO T. GONZALEZ, GERALD HEINAUER and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DESAI
as 2:2008cv01071
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BAKUL DESAI
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
