Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Kevin HoganIn re: Kevin Hogan
as 22-2870
Petitioner:
In re: KEVIN HOGAN
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT FRANK GILLIS, et al, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Augustus SimmonsIn re: Augustus Simmons
as 22-2102
Petitioner:
In re: AUGUSTUS SIMMONS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Tyree LawsonIn re: Tyree Lawson
as 22-1442
Petitioner:
In re: TYREE LAWSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Marzel Brickhouse v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 21-3098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARZEL BRICKHOUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Joel Muir v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 21-2859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL GLASTON MUIR
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nathan Terry v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 21-2236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN TERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Julian Fernandez v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 21-1640
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIAN FERNANDEZ
Julian FernandezIn re: Julian Fernandez
as 21-1635
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY
Petitioner:
In re: JULIAN FERNANDEZ
Charles Freeman v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 21-1451
Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHARLES FREEMAN
In re: Nathan Terry
as 21-1419
Petitioner:
In re: NATHAN TERRY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI, RICHARD A. LLORET and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
