Cases 1 - 10 of 238
United States of America v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2024cv00511
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, Kevin Stitt, Gentner Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
Welch v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2635
Plaintiff:
KENTRELL D WELCH
Defendant:
Warden WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM RUEBART, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
In re: Brewer
as 24-5046
Petitioner:
RENEL BREWER
Respondent:
GENTNER F DRUMMOND, Attorney General of Oklahoma
World Association of Icehockey Players Unions North America Division et al v. National Hockey League et al
as 1:2024cv01066
Plaintiff:
World Association of Icehockey Players Unions North America Division, World Association of Icehockey Players Unions USA Corporation, Tanner Gould and others
Defendant:
National Hockey League, Canadian Hockey League, Western Hockey League and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Caremark LLC et al v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Caremark LLC and CaremarkPCS Health LLC
Defendant:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Walter DrummondIn re: Walter Drummond
as 24-10699
Petitioner:
In re: WALTER DRUMMOND
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
