Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Rigsby v. Beshear, et al
as 21-6166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDY BESHEAR, Governor of the State of Kentucky, in his individual and official capacities, STATE OF KENTUCKY and UNITED STATES, individual and official capacities
Rigsby v. Great State of Arkansas, et al
as 21-6132
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
GREAT STATE OF ARKANSAS, PARKER, Boone County Public Defender and GREAT STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Rigsby v. Smith
as 21-6131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
STACY L. SMITH
Rigsby v. Custer County, Oklahoma, et al
as 21-6130
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CUSTER COUNTY, OKLAHOMA and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Rigsby v. Marler, et al
as 21-6124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. FNU MARLER, in official and individual capacity, AKA Dr. Marlar, FNU LNU, in official and individual capacity, Doctors at Oklahoma State Prison, DR. FNU PAIN, in official and individual capacity, of Corrections Corp. of America at C.C.F. in Cushing OK and others
Rigsby v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-6125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, of the Great State of Illinois; in the individual and official capacites, STATE OF ILLINOIS, in the individual and official capacites and FNU LNU, in the individual and official capacites; any other State or City doing reparations for slave descendants
Rigsby v. County of Custer, et al
as 21-6126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAY RIGSBY, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF CUSTER, in the individual and official capacites of Oklahoma in the United States, OKLAHOMA INDIGENT DEFENSE SYSTEM, in the individual and official capacites of Oklahoma in the United States and RICHARD L. YOHN, in the individual and official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
