Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Clements, et al. v. Porch.com, et al.
as 1:2020cv00003
Defendant:
Porch.com Inc., Matthew Ehrlichman, Darwin Widjaja and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Clements, Ina Nichole, Janes Seltenreich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chilkat Indian Village of Klukwan et al v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 3:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
Chilkat Indian Village of Klukwan , Southeast Alaska Conservation Council , Lynn Canal Conservation and others
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, Brian Steed, Karen Mouritsen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pebble Limited Partnership v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al
as 3:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
Pebble Limited Partnership
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency and Dennis J. McLerran
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Stacey et al v. Jewell et al
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
J. Dennis Stacey and Pelham L. Jackson
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Bureau of Land Management and Interior Department Board of Land Appeals
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1276 Interior: Review of Agency Action
Perales v. Obama et al
as 3:2011cv00182
Defendant:
Richard Bruce Cheney, Peter Hoekstra, Christopher Samuel Bond and others
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Northern Credit Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Don L. Wright
Defendant:
Northern Credit Services, Inc. and Dennis McCarty
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Greenpeace, Inc. et al v. Cole et al
as 3:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Greenpeace, Inc., Greenpeace, Inc., Greenpeace, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Forrest Cole, Dennis Bschor and United States Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Exxon Shipping Co et al v. Airport Depot Diner Inc et al
as 3:1991cv00222
Defendant:
Michael H. Connor, David Martin, Kelly McKittrick and others
Special Master:
David Ruskin
Plaintiff:
Exxon Pipeline Co
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
