Cases 1 - 8 of 8
TetherView, LLC v. Zuchowski et al
as 5:2019cv00019
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Laura B. Zuchowski and others
Plaintiff:
TetherView, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Kony Services, Inc. v. Zuchowski et al
as 2:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Kony Services, Inc.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Laura B. Zuchowski and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Migrant Justice et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2017cv00197
Plaintiff:
Migrant Justice and Matt Cameron
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security , United States Customs and Border Protection and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Robenstein v. United States Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Robert Robenstein
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bloomer v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
as 5:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Bloomer, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Bloomer v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2011cv00035
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Bloomer, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Perales v. Lowe's Companies, Incorporated et al
as 1:2009cv00173
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Incorporated, Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated, Sam's Club, Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Mylnikov et al v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
Anatoly Mylnikov, Anatoly Mylnikov, Irina Movshovich and others
Defendant:
Alberto Gonzales, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
