Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Alexandra Lozano Immigration Law, PLLC v. Meneses Law Firm PLLC et al
as 4:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Lozano Immigration Law, PLLC
Defendant:
Meneses Law Firm PLLC and Juan Pablo Diaz Cuenca
Monsky v. Direct Digital Holdings, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
Terry Monsky
Defendant:
Direct Digital Holdings, Inc., Mark Walker, Diana Diaz and others
Ferral Rodriguez et al. v. Mayorkas et al.
as 4:2024cv00977
Plaintiff:
Mariselis FERRAL RODRIGUEZ, Gretel MONTALVO FROMETA, Reinel LEIVA CRUZ and others
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and Anthony Blinken
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Diaz v. O'Brien
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jesse Diaz
Defendant:
Kyle O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diaz v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00333
Plaintiff:
Ubaldo Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
C.H. Robinson Company, Inc. v. Prometo Produce Corp. et al
as 7:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
C.H. Robinson Company, Inc. doing business as Robinson Fresh
Defendant:
Prometo Produce Corp. and Vicente Diaz Moreno
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Esparza v. Nares
as 4:2022cv03889
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Ramos Esparza
Defendant:
Vanadia Lisbeth Diaz Nares
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01762
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv01680
Plaintiff:
Chanette V. Diaz and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Skyler V. Denny
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
