Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Matthew Katz v. David Olan et al
as 2:2023cv03004
Defendant:
Olan Law, David Olan, Kenzi Levine and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Katz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe et al v. Bonta et al
as 3:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2 and others
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 va Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 14th Amendment
Reflex Media, Inc. v. Doe No. 1 et al
as 4:2018cv05018
Defendant:
Doe No. 1, Arman Ali, Marca Global, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Reflex Media, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Douglas Lee Hopper v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2018cv01277
Defendant:
County of Riverside, County of Riverside Sheriffs Department, Doe No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Lee Hopper
Herman Rene Ontiveros et al v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2018cv00101
Defendant:
Debbie Asuncion, Debbie Asuncion, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Herman Rene Ontiveros
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc. v. John Does 1-5 et al
as 2:2017cv07153
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-4, John Does 1-5 and XYZ Company
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc.
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc. v. John Does 1-5 et al
as 2:2017cv06694
Defendant:
Jane Does 1-4, John Does 1-5 and XYZ Company
Plaintiff:
Live Nation Merchandise, Inc.
McKay v. Board of Supervisors, John Does 1-100 et al
as 2:2017cv04563
Respondent:
Board of Supervisors, John Does 1-100, Robert Gutierrez M.D., John/Jane Does 1-3 and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan McKay
Socheat Chy v. Sing Lim et al
as 2:2017cv04325
Defendant:
Cindy Kanya Chan, Jane Doe 1, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Socheat Chy
Mcclung Jr. v. Darby et al
as 3:2016cv02006
Plaintiff:
Laurence E. Mcclung Jr.
Defendant:
Jason Darby, Geradine Tatalgue, High Horse Little and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
