Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Taebel v. Trump, et al.
as 24-2125
Plaintiff:
MITCH TAEBEL
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, named as Donald Trump, former President of the United States, DOUG DUCEY, AZ Governor, MARK BRNOVICH, AZ Attorney General and others
James Lynn Hines v. State Of California et al
as 2:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
State Of California, Gov Doug Ducey, Gov Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Mitchell Taebel v. County of Maricopa, et al
as 21-16919
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MITCHELL TAEBEL
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MARICOPA, DOUG DUCEY, AZ Governor, MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, AZ Attorney General and others
Tommy Quintier, Jr. v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16677
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOMMY QUINTIER, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Jermaine Pledger v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16546
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE PLEDGER
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA
Charles Ferguson v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16537
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES FERGUSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Gary Eisenmann v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16393
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY LANE EISENMANN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Jermaine Pledger v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16170
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERMAINE PLEDGER
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA
Dustin Reeder v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16143
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DUSTIN REEDER
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Richard Beyer, Jr. v. Doug Ducey, et al
as 21-16102
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG DUCEY, Governor and STATE OF ARIZONA, Real Party in Interest/Respondent
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD BEYER, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
