Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Wisconsin Voters Alliance, et al v. Kamala Harris, et al
as 21-5056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Arizona Voter Integrity Alliance, John Wood, Georgia Voters Alliance and others
Interested Party:
Mohrman, Kaardal & Erickson, P.A. and Erick G. Kaardal
Defendant / Appellee:
Jake Corman, Senate majority Leader of Pennsylvania Senate, in his official capacity, Bryan Carter, Speaker of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, in his official capacity, Tony Evers, Governor of Wisconsin, in his official capacity and others
Darrell Prince v. Kris Kobach, et al
as 20-5376
Defendant / Appellee:
Kris W. Kobach, named for his role promoting the Interstate Crosscheck program, is the former Secretary of State of Kansas, Ronna Romney Mcdaniel, Current head of the Republican National Committee, Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Darrell Prince
Vanderee v. Attorney General, State of Florida et al
as 8:2016cv03418
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Vanderee
Defendant:
Attorney General, State of Florida and the 29 individual members of the United States Electoral College from Florida
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 0431
James Grinols, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 13-70744
:
In re: JAMES GRINOLS, ROBERT ODDEN, EDWARD NOONAN and others
Petitioner:
JAMES GRINOLS, ROBERT ODDEN, EDWARD NOONAN and others
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
ELECTORAL COLLEGE, PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA and others
Inland Empire Voters et al v. United States of America et al
as 5:2008cv00304
Plaintiff:
Inland Empire Voters and Andrew Aames
Defendant:
United States of America, Office of the Federal Register, Electoral College and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
