Cases 1 - 6 of 6
HALLEY et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
ETHAN KESSLER HALLEY, ADAM FISCHER HALLEY, WENDY KESSLER HALLEY and others
Defendant:
ANTONY BLINKEN, RICHARD VERMA, TAMARA COFMAN WITTES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
FARRON et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
as 1:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
JULIANA FARRON, SHAHAR BAUSI, NOA BAUSI and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA et al v. FERRIERO
as 1:2020cv00242
Defendant:
DAVID S. FERRIERO
Plaintiff:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, STATE OF NEVADA and STATE OF ILLINOIS
Petitioner:
NEBRASKA, LOUISIANA, ALABAMA and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF HAWAII, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Not Classified By Court:
LEANNE LITTRELL DILORENZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
BAYER BIOSCIENCE GMBH et al v. DUDAS
as 1:2009cv00113
Plaintiff:
BAYER BIOSCIENCE GMBH and MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FODERUNG DER WISSENSCHAFTEN EV
Defendant:
JON W. DUDAS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LOVE et al v. VENEMAN
as 1:2000cv02502
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY LOVE , LIND MARIE BARA-WEAVER , MARGARET ODOM and others
Defendant:
TOM J. VILSACK
Movant:
BARBARA E, ADAMS , CHRISTINE BRAYBOY ANDERSON , GLADYS SCOTT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
COBELL, et al v. SALAZAR , et al
as 1:1996cv01285
Plaintiff:
ELOUISE PEPION COBELL , THOMAS MAULSON , JAMES LOUIS LAROSE and others
Movant:
ELENI M. CONSTANTINE , ROBERTA MCINERNEY , JAMES REGAN and others
Amicu:
QUAPAW TRIBE OF OKLAHOMA , NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS and ASSINIBOINE AND SIOUX TRIBES OF THE FORT PECK INDIAN RESERVATION
Defendant:
ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS , KEN SALAZAR , LARRY ECHOHAWK and others
Intervenor:
OSAGE NATION , NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND and MARK KESTER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
