Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Edward Ray, Jr. v. William Sullivan, et al
as 21-16705
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM JOE SULLIVAN, Warden, Warden at CCI, LEWIS, Sergeant at CCI, EATON, Corrections Sergeant at CCI and others
Edward Ray, Jr. v. S. Chefalo
as 21-15238
Defendant / Appellee:
S. CHEFALO, Sergeant at CCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Sabrina Farrell, et al
as 20-15113
Defendant / Appellee:
SABRINA ROXANNE FARRELL, ALAMEDA COUNTY and ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. A. Ribera, et al
as 20-15021
Defendant / Appellee:
J. GUTIERREZ, Associate Warden at CCI, B. CATES, Chief Deputy Warden at CCI and A. RIBERA, Water and Sewer Plant Supervisor at CCI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Ted Bloom, et al
as 19-17584
Defendant / Appellee:
C. KOENIG, TED BLOOM and M. COLVIN
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Gavin Newsome, et al
as 19-17493
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ALAMEDA COUNTY and GAVIN NEWSOME
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. P. Vasquez
as 19-17459
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
P. L. VASQUEZ
Edward Ray, Jr. v. Peter Eng, et al
as 19-17430
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER ENG, Deputy Trial Counsel at State Bar of California L.A. and ALAMEDA COUNTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. A. Oliva, et al
as 19-17431
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN D. BITER, Chief Deputy Warden, G. GARCIA, Accounting Officer Specialist, S. FIGUEROA, Office Technician Accounting Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Edward Ray, Jr. v. L. Parreno
as 19-17137
Defendant / Appellee:
L. PARRENO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD VINCENT RAY, Jr.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
