Cases 1 - 10 of 16
In re: Oneil Cherrington
as 16-4065
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: ONEIL CHERRINGTON
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M. KOSIK
In re: Scott Njo
as 16-2892
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: SCOTT NJOS
Defendant - Respondent:
WARDEN LEWISBURG USP
Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M. KOSIK
In re: George Willie Buford
as 16-1878
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: GEORGE WILLIE BUFORD, III
Defendant - Respondent:
HARRELL WATTS, BOP NORTHEAST REGIONAL COUNSEL, WARDEN LEWISBURG USP and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M. KOSIK
In Re: Michael Rinaldi
as 13-2312
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL RINALDI
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M. KOSIK
In re: Ronald Dandar
as 11-3201
Petitioner:
In re: RONALD G. DANDAR
Respondent:
CLERK OF COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M KOSIK
In re: Elijah Crosby
as 11-1741
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ELIJAH CROSBY
Defendant - Respondent:
JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, JOHN W. KERESTES, DAVID W. MCANNANEY and others
Defendant - Pro Se Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M KOSIK
In re: Marcus Wallace, et al
as 11-1508
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS L WALLACE
Defendant - Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and FRANKLIN COUNTY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M KOSIK
In re: Marcus Wallace, et al
as 11-1510
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS L WALLACE
Defendant - Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and FRANKLIN COUNTY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M KOSIK
In re: Marcus Wallace, et al
as 11-1509
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MARCUS L WALLACE
Defendant - Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and FRANKLIN COUNTY
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M KOSIK
In re: Michael Reynold
as 10-4676
Petitioner - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL CURTIS REYNOLDS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
EDWIN M KOSIK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
