Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Olson v. Amador County Superior Court
as 23-4020
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES OLSON
Respondent / Appellee:
AMADOR COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Rodgers v. Town of Hempstead et al
as 2:2022cv05895
Plaintiff:
Timothy Rodgers
Defendant:
Town of Hempstead, Town of Hempstead Department of Occupational Resources, HempsteadWorks Career Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Eric K'napp v. Craig Koenig
as 20-15184
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP, AKA Eric C.R. K'napp
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ and CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
Eric K'napp v. Craig Koenig
as 20-70348
Petitioner:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP, AKA Eric C.R. K'napp
Respondent:
CRAIG KOENIG, Acting Warden
USA v. Eric Means
as 19-30620
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC CHARLES MEANS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Eric K'napp v. USDC-SAC
as 18-72247
:
In re: ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Petitioner:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and SCOTT KERNAN
Eric K'napp v. Dave Davey
as 16-73873
Petitioner:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY K'NAPP
Respondent:
DAVE DAVEY, Warden
Heinrich v. United States of America
as 3:2015cv00559
Plaintiff:
Eric Charles Heinrich
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Eric Knapp v. USDC-CAFR
as 13-73365
:
In re: ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Petitioner:
ERIC CHARLES RODNEY KNAPP
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION, SIERRA CONSERVATION CENTER, CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
