Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Dawson v. Archambeau, et al
as 21-1307
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF ARCHAMBEAU, the CEO of Colorado Health Partners, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, SUSAN TIONA, Chief Medical Officer of the Colorado Department of Corrections and others
Cappelli, et al v. Hoover, et al
as 21-1110
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Govenor of the State of Colorado, RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, WILLIAM HOOVER, Sergeant, Lakewood Police Department and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON ALAN CAPPELLI and VINCENT C. TODD
Dawson v. Archambeau, et al
as 20-1451
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, T. SICOTTE, C. IRELAND, FCF Health Providers and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Kilman v. Williams, et al
as 19-1476
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TOBI KILMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE ORTIZ, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., ARISTEDES ZAVARES, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C., FRANK GUNTER, Former Executive Director of the C.D.O.C. and others
In re: Dawson
as 19-1412
Respondent:
C. IRELAND, FCF Health Providers, SUSAN TIONA, Chief Medical Officer of the Colorado Department of Corrections, D. HIBBS and others
Petitioner:
JAMES RALPH DAWSON, JR.
Fetzer v. Raemisch, et al
as 19-1200
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND LEE FETZER
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections and MARY CARLSON, Head of Time/Release Operations for the C.D.O.C.
Fetzer v. Raemisch, et al
as 19-1124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND LEE FETZER
Defendant / Appellee:
RICK RAEMISCH, Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections and MARY CARLSON, Head of Time/Release Operations for the C.D.O.C.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
