Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Torres v. The State of New York
as 19-2184
Defendant / Appellee:
Shalaya Brown, Individually and as Pelchaps employee, Donna D'Amico, Individually and as employee of Children's Foster Services, P.O. Michael Baio, Individually and as employee of Mental Health Services and others
Defendant:
John Doe, Gladys Carrion, as Commissioner of NYC administration for Children's Services, Richard Doe and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adriana Torres, Individually and on behalf of A.A.M. and K.T., infants,
Family Court of the State of New York City of New York County of Kings v. F.W. et al
as 1:2017cv07346
A Minor:
F.W.
Plaintiff:
Family Court of the State of New York City of New York County of Kings
Defendant:
Lorren Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Torres v. The State of New York
as 17-389
Petitioner:
Adriana Torres, Individually and on behalf of
Respondent:
State of New York, Judge Arnold Lim, Individually and as Judge of the Family Court of the State of New York, the County of Richmond, City of New York and others
Defendant:
John Doe and Richard Roe
Corrado v. Freundlich
as 16-2796
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Corrado
Defendant - Appellee:
Judge Freundlich, Family Court of the State of New York
v. Abdel et al
as 1:2015cv01554
Claimant:
Rahman El Ezekiel Abdel
Respondent:
Rachel Kaufman, William P. Warren, Eric T. Schneiderman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graham v. New York Center for Interpersonal Development et al
as 1:2015cv00459
Defendant:
Lisa Aschkenasy, Jody Bahar, Ian Berliner and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica C. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Graham v. Family Court of The State of New York
as 1:2015cv00419
Defendant:
Family Court of The State of New York
Plaintiff:
Jessica C. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
