Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Floyd v. LVNV Funding LLC
as 2:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jeanna Floyd
Defendant:
LVNV Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bordeau Metals, LLC et al v. Floyd County, Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00193
Counter Defendant:
Bordeau Metals, LLC and BB&K Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Floyd County, Georgia, Rome-Floyd County Development Authority and Jamie McCord
Counter Claimant:
Development Authority of Floyd County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cooley v. First Data Merchant Services, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01185
Defendant:
John Doe Corporation, First Data Merchant Services, LLC, John Doe Corporation doing business as One Connect Processing and others
Plaintiff:
Blake Cooley and Louis Floyd
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04260
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601
Mitchell v. Barrie
as 1:2019cv01208
Defendant:
Judge Tangela M. Barrie
Plaintiff:
Floyd C. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Arnold El v. State of Georgia
as 1:2018mi00069
Plaintiff:
Floyd Antonio Arnold El
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
City of Rome et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2018cv00052
Plaintiff:
City of Rome , Floyd County, Georgia , Chattooga County, Georgia and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
