Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Marlon Darrell Evans v. George Galaza
as 2:1998cv08536
Petitioner:
Marlon Darrel Evans
Respondent:
George Galaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derron McLead v. George Galaza
as 5:2002cv00858
Respondent:
George Galaza
Petitioner:
Derron McLead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Ray Hanline v. George Galaza, et al
as 5:2000cv00530
Respondent:
California State Attorney General and George Galaza
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Hanline
Miscellaneou:
Robert Soares and Honorable Steven Stone
Movant:
Robert Soares and Steven Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sirhan B Sirhan v. George Galaza, et al
as 2:2000cv05686
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of California and George Galaza
Objector:
Michael McCowan
Petitioner:
Sirhan Bishar Sirhan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Omer Harland Gallion v. George Galaza, et al
as 8:2000cv00491
Respondent:
California State Attorney General and George Galaza
Unknown:
Case Assignment Administrator, Dep In Chg So Div, Statistics Clerk and others
Petitioner:
Omer Harland Gallion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
J.P. Parnell v. G. Galaza, et al
as 2:1997cv05759
Respondent:
Attorney General State of California and G Galaza
Petitioner:
J P Parnell
Unknown:
George H Williamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Galaza
as 2:2003cv01723
Petitioner:
Victor Hunt
Respondent:
George M Galaza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Dept of Corrections, et al
as 1:1997cv06173
Plaintiff:
David Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
- Dept of Corrections , Galaza and Kings County Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
