Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Eric ScottIn re: Eric Scott
as 23-10519
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC BERNARD SCOTT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and CHAIRMAN GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Eric ScottIn re: Eric Scott
as 22-13750
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC BERNARD SCOTT
Respondent:
CHAIRMAN GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Kevin Jones v. Brian Kemp, et al
as 21-11349
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Individual and Official Capacity, DAMON T. HININGER, Core Civic President and CEO, Individual and Official Capacity, COMMISSIONER, Dept. of Corr., Individual and Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN G. JONES
Leroy Banks, III v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 20-13266
Respondent / Appellee:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES and BOWMAN, Officer
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEROY BANKS, III
Quincey Smith v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 20-11632
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E. BARNARD, BRAXTON T. COTTON, Vice Chairman, State Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINCEY SMITH
Jean Merilien v. Georgia State Board of Pardons
as 20-10445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEAN JOCELYN MERILIEN
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, and it's five members and GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES
Albert Thomas v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 19-13756
Defendant / Appellee:
GARFIELD HAMMONDS, JR., BOBBY K. WHITWORTH, TIMOTHY E. JONES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT THOMAS
Thomas, et al v. Miller, et al
as 1:1996cv00527
Plaintiff:
Albert Thomas
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles , Timothy E. Jones , Bobby K. Whitworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
