Cases 1 - 10 of 239
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Violation of Credit Repair Organizations Act
Glenn Dietel v. Rivian Automotive, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv03269
Plaintiff:
Glenn Dietel
Defendant:
Rivian Automotive, Inc., Robert J. Scaringe and Claire McDonough
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01816
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anya Roberts v. eXp Realty, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv10492
Plaintiff:
Anya Roberts
Defendant:
eXp Realty, LLC, eXp World Holdings, Inc., Michael L Bjorkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flannery Assoc. LLC v. Barnes Family Ranch Assoc., LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Flannery Associates LLC
Defendant:
Barnes Family Ranch Associates, LLC, Lambie Ranch Associates, LLC, Kirby Hill Associates, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Glenn Turner v. DCH Honda of Temecula et al
as 5:2023cv00693
Plaintiff:
Glenn Turner
Defendant:
DCH Honda of Temecula, Wells Fargo Auto and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1981 Fraud-Motor Vehicle (Odometer)
Miyamoto v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Hannah Miyamoto
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jonathan Skrmetti and Glenn R. Funk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ss Fed. Question: Constitutionality of State Statutes
Fabiola Acevedo et al v. eXp World Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01304
Plaintiff:
Fabiola Acevedo, Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2 and others
Defendant:
eXp World Holdings, Inc., eXp Realty, LLC, Michael L Bjorkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
