Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In Re Subpoena to Thomas Horstemeyer, LLP
as 1:2023cv04966
Respondent:
Thomas Horstemeyer LLP
Petitioner:
In Re Subpoena to Thomas Horstemeyer, LLP, Dynatemp International, Inc., Fluorofusion Specialty Chemicals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gresham et al v. Ryder Trucking Company et al
as 1:2019cv05113
Defendant:
James Barbieri, Ryder Trucking Company, Matthew Lewis Baisley and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Gresham and Jasmine Batten
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bagby v. State Farm Casualty Insura et al
as 1:2018cv05353
Plaintiff:
Vincent A. Bagby
Defendant:
Jeremy Berry, Lexis Nexis C.L.U.E., City of Atlanta Fire Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Gresham Transportation Services, LLC v. MV Contract Transportation, Inc.
as 1:2017cv03431
Plaintiff:
Gresham Transportation Services, LLC
Defendant:
MV Contract Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Gresham v. Clayton County Collaborative Authority et al
as 1:2013cv03597
Plaintiff:
Sandra A. Gresham
Defendant:
Clayton County Collaborative Authority and Eldrin Bell
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
