Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Amir Kaki v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation, et al
as 21-1161
Defendant / Appellant:
DR. ANTHONY TEDESCHI, President of VHS OF MICHIGAN and CEO of DMC, an individual, VHS SINAI-GRACE HOSPITAL, INC., a foreign for-profit corporation, JOHN LEVY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAHIR ELDER, M.D., an individual and AMIR KAKI, M.D., an individual
Amir Kaki v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation, et al
as 21-1100
Defendant / Appellant:
CONRAD MALLET, CEO, DR. ANTHONY TEDESCHI, TENET HEALTHCARE CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAHIR ELDER, M.D. and AMIR KAKI, M.D.
Defendant:
JOHN LEVY
Schreiber v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv10965
Defendant:
VHS Detroit Receiving Hospital, Inc., Eric Evans, VHYS Sinai-Grace Hospital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MD Theodore J Schreiber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kaki, M.D. et al v. Tenet Healthcare Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv10863
Defendant:
VHS Detroit Receiving Hospital, Inc., Eric Evans, VHS Harper-Hutzel Hospital, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Amir Kaki, M.D. and Dr. Mahir Elder, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Detroit Receiving Hospital and, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 08-1920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DETROIT RECEIVING HOSPITAL AND UNIVERSITY HEALTH CENTER, OAKWOOD ANNAPOLIS HOSPITAL, BEYER HOSPITAL and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL O. LEAVITT, In his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, In her official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv12382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center et al v. Leavitt
as 2:2007cv11181
Plaintiff:
Detroit Receiving Hospital and University Health Center, Oakwood Annapolis Hospital, Beyer Hospital and others
Defendant:
Michael O. Leavitt
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
