Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Morrow v. Bauersfeld
as 21-2928
Plaintiff / Appellant: Neb Morrow, III
Defendant / Appellee: Bauersfeld, Commissioner's Hearing Officer (CHO), Auburn Correctional Facility
Defendant: Harold Graham, Superintendent, Auburn Correctional Facility, Sergeant Van Fleet, Superintendent of D-Block, Auburn Correctional Facility and J. Perkins, Corrections Officer in D-Block, Auburn Correctional Facility
Dukes v. Graham
as 21-2374
Petitioner / Appellant: Robert Dukes
Respondent / Appellee: Harold Graham
Turner v. Graham
as 21-939
Respondent / Appellee: Superintendent Harold Graham, of Auburn Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant: Myrreheleki Turner
Cotton v. Graham
as 20-4172
Respondent / Appellee: Superintendent Harold Graham
Petitioner / Appellant: Maurice Cotton
Allen v. Graham
as 20-3040
Petitioner / Appellant: Carl Allen
Respondent / Appellee: Harold Graham
LaTouche v. Graham
as 19-4006
Respondent: Superintendent Harold Graham, Auburn Correctional Facility
Petitioner: Valery LaTouche
Richard v. Department of Correctional Ser
as 19-3120
Defendant: Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, FKA Department of Correctional Services, Patrick J. Griffin, Superintendent; Sullivan Correctional Facility, Mahunik, Sergeant; Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: John Willis Richard
Defendant / Appellee: Mays/Mace, Sergeant; Sullivan Correctional Facility, Dennis Giglio, Deputy Superintendent of Security; Sullivan Correctional Facility, Lieutenant P.O. Burns, Auburn Correctional Facility and others
Heidgen v. Graham
as 19-266
Respondent / Appellee: N.Y.S. DOCCS and Harold Graham, Superintendent Auburn Correctional Facility
Petitioner / Appellant: Martin Heidgen
Munford v. Graham
as 18-1947
Petitioner - Appellant: Curtis Munford
Respondent - Appellee: Harold Graham, Superintendent
Williams v. Graham
as 17-4041
Petitioner: Anthony Williams
Respondent: Harold Graham

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?