Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Michael Friedman, et al v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al
as 11-5028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Friedman, Paul D. Goldenheim and Howard R. Udell
Defendant - Appellee:
Kathleen Sebelius, in her official capacity as Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services and Daniel R. Levinson, in his official capacity as Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services
FRIEDMAN et al v. US DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SVCS et al
as 1:2010cv00130
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRIEDMAN and HOWARD R. UDELL
Defendant:
US DEPT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SVCS and DANIEL R. LEVINSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
FRIEDMAN et al v. LEAVITT et al
as 1:2008cv00586
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRIEDMAN , PAUL D. GOLDENHEIM and HOWARD R. UDELL
Defendant:
DANIEL R. LEVINSON , CHARLES E. JOHNSON and KATHLEEN SEBELIUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
FRIEDMAN et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2009cv02028
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL FRIEDMAN, PAUL D. GOLDENHEIM and HOWARD R. UDELL
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS and DANIEL R. LEVINSON
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
Friedman et al v. US Dept of Health and Human Svcs et al
as 3:2009cv01741
Plaintiff:
Michael Friedman and Howard R. Udell
Defendant:
US Dept of Health and Human Svcs and Daniel R. Levinson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2007cv06916
Plaintiff:
New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund, New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund, New Mexico United Food and Commercial Workers Union's and Employers' Health and Welfare Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., The Purdue Fredrick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
