Cases 1 - 10 of 2,957
Radiance Technologies Inc v. Baker
as 5:2024cv00794
Plaintiff:
Radiance Technologies Inc
Defendant:
Jade Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Gugel et al v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 7:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Kenneth M Gugel and Karen M Gugel
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc, Thor Industries Inc, Tiffin Motor Homes Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00781
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Norwood v. Tennessee Credit Management Inc
as 3:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
Eric Norwood
Defendant:
Tennessee Credit Management Inc a Tennessee corporation doing business as TCM Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Russo et al v. Raimondo et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Dominick Russo, James Russo and FFC Seafood, Inc.
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo, Janet Coit and National Marine Fisheries Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Scott v. Sirius XM Radio Inc
as 5:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Micah Scott
Defendant:
Sirius XM Radio Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
