Cases 1 - 10 of 352
Tobiason v. BMO Bank NA
as 2:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Ean J Tobiason
Defendant:
BMO Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sherven, Matthew v. U.S. Secret Service
as 3:2023cv00632
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant:
U.S. Secret Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sherven, Matthew v. National Security Agency
as 3:2023cv00603
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant:
National Security Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Gerbers et al v. Otradovec et al
as 1:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Robert B Gerbers and Betty J Gerbers
Defendant:
Richard J Otradovec, RODAC LLC and Ash Investors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Formtec LLC v. Spherical IP LLC
as 1:2023cv00516
Petitioner:
Formtec LLC
Respondent:
Spherical IP LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Michael J Morris and Bennett Hartman LLP
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith v. Garland et al
as 2:2022cv01535
Plaintiff:
Maria Elvia Smith
Defendant:
Merrick B Garland, Ur M Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Sherven, Matthew v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 3:2022cv00636
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sherven
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
