Other Statutes Cases
In re: Alton D. Brown, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2749
Petitioner: In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent: GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent: JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: Juan Garcia-Villa
as 15-3348
Defendant - Petitioner: In re: JUAN ANTONIO GARCIA-VILLA, a/k/a Tony
Plaintiff - Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent: J. CURTIS JOYNER
In re: Alton Brown, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-1616
Petitioner: In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Respondent: GARY L. LANCASTER, J. CURTIS JOYNER, THOMAS J. RUETER and others
Nominal Respondent: JAMES M. MUNLEY
In re: Tyrone Peele
as 14-4190
Petitioner: In re: TYRONE PEELE
Respondent: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ROSEMARY ZECCARDI, HONORABLE JUDGE JOAN BROWN and others
Tyrone Peele
as 14-4191
Petitioner: TYRONE PEELE
Respondent: DONNA WOELPPER, HEBA GORE, JONATH STRANGE and others
Nominal Respondent: J. CURTIS JOYNER
In re: Patrick McPherron
as 14-1400
Petitioner: In re: PATRICK S. MCPHERRON
Nominal Respondent: THOMAS J. RUETER and J. CURTIS JOYNER
In re: Chris Washington-El We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-4740
Plaintiff - Petitioner: In re: CHRIS WASHINGTON-EL
Defendant - Respondent: DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, JOHN MURRAY, A.S. WILLIAMSON and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent: J. CURTIS JOYNER
In re: Bertram Russell
as 13-4414
Petitioner: In re: BERTRAM R. RUSSELL
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent: J. CURTIS JOYNER
KAUFMAN et al v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01610
Plaintiff: RICHARD PHILIP KAUFMAN and MICHAEL NORLEY
Defendant: INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY, MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURT 32-2-49 and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?