Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Michael Vaughan v. James Erwin, et al
as 21-5361
Defendant / Appellee:
ANGELA FRENCH, in her individual capacity, COMMISSIONER JAMES ERWIN, in his individual and official capacities, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & WARDEN RAVONNE SIMS, in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Michael Vaughan v. Jonathan Grate, et al
as 21-5387
Defendant / Appellee:
REBECCA BARKER, RCC Unit 3 Administrator, Law Library Manager, in her individual & official capacities, ASHLEY SHORT, in her individual & official capacities, AMY ROBEY, RCC Deputy Warden for Operations, in her individual & official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DEAN VAUGHAN
Dawn Crawford v. John Tilley, et al
as 20-6391
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAWN CRAWFORD, in her capacity as Administratrix of the Estate of Marc Crawford
Defendant:
JOHN TILLEY, individually and in his official capacity as Secretary of the Justice & Public Safety Cabinet
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMES ERWIN, individually and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Kentucky Department of Corrections and JAMES ERWIN, individually
Johnny Cissell v. William Myers, et al
as 19-6408
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE, JAMES ERWIN, STEPHANIE CHOWNING and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHNNY LEE CISSELL
Tarango et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as CAN/4:13-cv-03070
Plaintiff:
Carlos Tarango , Gregory Adams , Mary Barksdale and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Syrek et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as CAC/8:13-cv-00987
Plaintiff:
John Syrek , Gregory Adams , Shirley McCoy and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
James Erwin v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv08403
Petitioner:
James Erwin
Respondent:
United States of America
James Erwin Ball v. Licoln Electric Co., et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-71063
Plaintiff:
James Erwin Ball
Defendant:
Licoln Electric Co
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
