Cases 1 - 9 of 9
CFPB v. Consumer First Legal Group, LLC, et al
as 22-2620
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Defendant / Appellee:
MORTGAGE LAW GROUP, LLP, doing business as The Law Firm of Macey, Aleman & Searns, CONSUMER FIRST LEGAL GROUP, LLC, THOMAS G. MACEY and others
CFPB v. Consumer First Legal Group, LLC, et al
as 22-2503
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Defendant / Appellant:
CONSUMER FIRST LEGAL GROUP, LLC, THOMAS G. MACEY, JEFFREY J. ALEMAN and others
CFPB v. Consumer First Legal Group, LLC, et al
as 22-2430
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Defendant / Appellant:
CONSUMER FIRST LEGAL GROUP, LLC, THOMAS G. MACEY, JEFFREY J. ALEMAN and others
CFPB v. Consumer First Legal Group, LL, et al
as 20-1708
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS G. MACEY, HAROLD E. STAFFORD, JEFFREY J. ALEMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
CFPB v. Consumer First Legal Group, LL, et al
as 19-3396
Defendant / Appellant:
CONSUMER FIRST LEGAL GROUP, LLC, JEFFREY J. ALEMAN, JASON SEARNS and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION BUREAU
Legalzoom.com, Inc. v. Law Offices of Prince & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2016mc20636
Plaintiff:
Legalzoom.com, Inc.
Defendant:
Law Offices of Prince & Associates, LLC, David Prince and Jason Searns
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
LegalZoom.com, Inc. v. Law Offices of Prince & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2016rj00003
Plaintiff:
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
Defendant:
Law Offices of Prince & Associates, LLC, David Prince and Jason Searns
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02498
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
