Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Jesse Olivar v. John Potter
as 19-16204
Plaintiff / Appellant: JESSE OLIVAR
Defendant / Appellee: JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General
Oscar Dantzler v. EEOC, et al
as 12-5060
Plaintiff - Appellant: Oscar Dantzler
Defendant - Appellee: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Keith Hills, Agent Does One-Five and others
Darrell Coburn v. John Potter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-2476
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRELL COBURN
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General
Srikanth Tangirala v. USDCSAC
as 10-70152
: In re: SRIKANTH TANGIRALA
Petitioner: SRIKANTH TANGIRALA
Respondent: USDC, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest: JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, U.S. Postal Service, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION and others
United America Financial, Inc. v. John Potter
as 10-5002
Plaintiff - Appellee: United America Financial, Incorporated
Defendant - Appellant: John E. Potter, Postmaster General
MITCHELL V USPS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1505
Appellee: John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Appellant: Sarah M. Mitchell
FOX V USPS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1376
Appellant: Janet Fox and Todd Fox
Appellee: John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
JETT V POTTER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1356
Defendant-Appellee: John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
BAIAMONTE V USPS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1104
Appellant: Frank Baiamonte
Appellee: John E. Potter, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
Darrell Coburn v. John Potter We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-4014
Plaintiff - Appellant: DARRELL COBURN
Defendant - Appellee: JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?