Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. Providence Health & Services, et al
as 21-56324
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NINA RINGGOLD, In the Capacity As A Named Agent Under Advance Health Care Directive And In Her Individual Capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES and DOES, 1-10
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. Providence Health & Services, et al
as 21-56323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART, As Personal Representative of the Estate of Eddye Melaragno and NINA RINGGOLD, In the Capacity As A Named Agent Under Advance Health Care Directive And In Her Individual Capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
PROVIDENCE HEALTH & SERVICES and DOES, 1-10
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 13-71484
:
In re: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner:
NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Nina Ringgold, et al v. USDC-SAC
as 12-72500
:
In re: NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Petitioner:
NINA RINGGOLD, JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and LAW OFFICES OF NINA RINGGOLD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
JERRY BROWN, in his Individual and Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and in his Individual and Official Capacity as Former Attorney General of the State of California, KAMALA HARRIS, in her Individual and Official Capacity as Current Attorney General of the State of California, COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. Myer J. Sankary, et al
as 11-57247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, MYER J. SANKARY, AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY and others
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-57231
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ANDREA SHERIDAN ORDIN, erroneously sued as Andrea Sheridan Orin, in her Official Capacity as County Counsel, JERRY BROWN, in his Official Capacity as Governor of the State of California and others
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. County of Los Angeles, et al
as 11-56973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, JOHN A. CLARKE, in his Official and Adminstrative Capacity as Executive Officer of the Superior Court of the County of Los Angeles, ANDREA SHERIDAN ORDIN, erroneously sued as Andrea Sheridan Orin, in her Official Capacity as County Counsel and others
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv01725
Defendant:
Jerry Brown, John A Clarke, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Nina Ringgold and Justin Ringgold-Lockhart
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. Myer Sankary, et al
as 11-55063
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and NINA RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
MYER J. SANKARY, AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY, NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY and others
Justin Ringgold-Lockhart, et al v. Myer Sankary, et al
as 10-56175
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN RINGGOLD-LOCKHART and NINA RAE RINGGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
MYER J. SANKARY, AMERICAN CONTRACTORS INDEMNITY COMPANY, NORTH AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
