Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Nathaniel SwintIn re: Nathaniel Swint
as 19-3690
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ALLENWOOD USP, WARDEN
Not Yet Classified:
JAN E. DUBOIS
Petitioner:
In re: NATHANIEL SWINT
Lacey Grave
as 17-2784
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: LACEY GRAVES
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E. DUBOIS
In re: Dennis Campbell, et al
as 16-3790
Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Respondent:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E. DUBOIS, HARVEY BARTLE, III and JAMES KNOLL GARDNER
In Re: Jason Isaac West
as 16-3759
Petitioner:
JASON ISAAC WEST
Respondent:
MICHAEL OVERMYER
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E. DUBOIS
In re: Dennis Campbell, et al
as 15-2152
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DENNIS JOHN CAMPBELL and MINDY JAYE ZIED-CAMPBELL
Defendant - Respondent:
POSTMASTER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E. DUBOIS
In re: Jason Kokinda
as 14-4164
Petitioner:
In re: JASON KOKINDA
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY and SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E. DUBOIS and LYNNE A. SITARSKI
In re: Anthony Harper
as 14-1022
Petitioner:
In re: ANTHONY HARPER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E. DUBOIS
In re: Jason Collura, et al
as 13-1842
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: JASON COLLURA
Defendant - Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CEDRIC WHITE, JOSEPH CORVI and others
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E. DUBOIS
In re: Paul Satterfield
as 12-1108
Petitioner:
In re: PAUL SATTERFIELD
Respondent:
PHILIP L. JOHNSON, DA PHILADELPHIA and ATTY GEN PA
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E DUBOIS
In Re: Nate Swint
as 11-1416
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: NATHANIEL SWINT
Plaintiff - Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
JAN E DUBOIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
