Cases 1 - 10 of 33
In re: Robert Hammer, et al
as 22-0504
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT HAMMER, Assistant Special Agent in Charge, HSI, DAVID VICENTE PENA, FRANCISCO AYALA, Agent, ICE ERO and others
Respondent:
ISABELA ZELAYA, GERONIMO GUERRERO, CAROLINA ROMULO MENDOZA and others
NIEVES v. VELEZ et al
as 2:2016cv01594
Plaintiff:
ANDRES SR. NIEVES
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ , VALERIE HARR , DIVISION MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
DEAL v. VELEZ et al
as 1:2014cv06444
Plaintiff:
GRACE DEAL
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ, VALERIE HARR and DANIEL BOAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
STACKHOUSE v. VELEZ et al
as 2:2014cv00523
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH STACKHOUSE
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ , VALERIE HARR and CHRISTINE HELLYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
GLOUCESTER MANOR REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER, INC. v. SEBELIUS et al
as 1:2013cv06875
Plaintiff:
GLOUCESTER MANOR REHABILITATION AND CARE CENTER, INC.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, MARILYN TAVENNER, MARY O'DOWD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
BRILL v. VELEZ et al
as 1:2013cv05643
Plaintiff:
ADA BRILL
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and VALERIE HARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
ROGERS v. VELEZ et al
as 3:2012cv05655
Plaintiff:
ROSE MARIE ROGERS
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and VALERIE HARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
RAE v. VELEZ et al
as 2:2012cv05082
Plaintiff:
ANNIE RAE
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and VALERIE HARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
LeFEVERE et al v. VELEZ et al
as 3:2012cv02619
Plaintiff:
RALPH LeFEVERE , THERESA MORSE and HELEN POVOLO
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ and VALERIE HARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
BINGERT v. VELEZ et al
as 3:2012cv01276
Plaintiff:
CATHERINE BINGERT
Defendant:
JENNIFER VELEZ, VALERIE HARR and DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE AND HEALTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
