Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Wang v. Dermira, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00634
Defendant:
Thomas G. Wiggans, Matthew Fust, Dermira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Surakanti v. Dermira, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00602
Defendant:
Thomas G. Wiggans, Matthew Fust, Dermira, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Dushyanth Surakanti
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2014cv01345
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Marilyn Tavenner and others
Plaintiff:
Santa Rosa Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Stanley H. Epstein v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 2:2013cv08728
Plaintiff:
Stanley H. Epstein
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Center for Food Safety et al v. Sebelius et al
as 4:2013cv01975
Plaintiff:
Center for Food Safety , Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy , Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Margaret A. Hamburg
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
University of California, San Diego Medical Center v. Sebelius
as 3:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
University of California, San Diego Medical Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
San Fernando Post Acute Hospital v. Kathleen Sebelius
as 2:2013cv01065
Petitioner:
San Fernando Post Acute Hospital
Respondent:
Kathleen Sebelius
Harkonen v. Sebelius et al
as 3:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
W. Scott Harkonen
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Daniel R. Levinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
San Joaquin Community Hospital v. Sebelius
as 1:2012cv01642
Plaintiff:
San Joaquin Community Hospital
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
San Joaquin Community Hospital v. Sebelius
as 1:2012at00647
Plaintiff:
San Joaquin Community Hospital
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
